Understanding the Relationship Between Isocyanate Index and Foam Properties in TDI-80 Polyurethane Foaming
By a foam enthusiast who once tried to make a mattress in his garage and ended up with something closer to a hockey puck 🏒
Let’s talk about polyurethane foam. Not the kind you use to clean your coffee mug (though that’s PU too), but the fluffy, squishy, sometimes memory-retaining stuff that makes your couch feel like a cloud and your car seat not feel like a medieval torture device.
At the heart of this magic lies a delicate chemical dance—between polyols and isocyanates. And in this dance, one partner leads: the isocyanate index. Today, we’re focusing on TDI-80, that 80:20 toluene diisocyanate blend that’s been the workhorse of flexible slabstock foam for decades. If polyurethane foam were a rock band, TDI-80 would be the lead guitarist—loud, essential, and slightly toxic if you don’t handle it right. 🔥🎸
What’s This “Index” Business?
First, let’s demystify the term isocyanate index. It’s not some Wall Street number or a climate change metric. In polyurethane chemistry, the index is a ratio that tells you how much isocyanate you’re using relative to the stoichiometric amount needed for complete reaction.
Index = (Actual NCO groups used / Theoretical NCO groups required) × 100
So, an index of 100 means you’re using just enough isocyanate to react with all the OH groups in the polyol.
An index above 100? You’re going overboard—extra NCO floating around.
Below 100? You’re skimping—some OH groups will be left holding hands with no one.
For TDI-80 systems, we typically play in the 80–115 range. Why? Because foam isn’t just about reaction completion—it’s about structure, softness, durability, and not collapsing like a soufflé in a drafty kitchen.
TDI-80: The OG Isocyanate
TDI-80 is 80% 2,4-TDI and 20% 2,6-TDI. The 2,4 isomer reacts faster, giving you that initial kick, while the 2,6 isomer chills in the background, contributing to crosslinking later. It’s like having a sprinter and a marathon runner on the same team.
| Property | Value for TDI-80 |
|---|---|
| NCO Content (wt%) | ~30.8–31.5% |
| Functionality | ~2.0 (mostly difunctional) |
| Viscosity (25°C) | ~10–15 mPa·s |
| Reactivity (vs. MDI) | High – reacts fast with polyols |
| Typical Use | Flexible slabstock foam |
Source: Oertel, G. (1985). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
The Index-Foam Property Tango
Now, let’s get to the juicy part: how does changing the index affect the foam?
Think of the index as the seasoning in a stew. Too little salt—bland. Too much—inedible. Same with NCO.
We’ll break it down into key foam properties and see how they respond when you tweak the index.
1. Density – The “Heft” Factor
You’d think more isocyanate = denser foam. But nope. Density is mostly controlled by blowing agent (usually water, which reacts with NCO to make CO₂). However, index indirectly affects density via reaction kinetics.
- At low index (80–90): Less NCO means slower reaction, delayed gelation. Foam rises too much, may collapse. Density might drop due to poor cell structure.
- At index 100: Balanced rise and gelation. Optimal density control.
- At high index (105–115): Faster gelation, tighter cells, slightly higher density due to better structure retention.
| Index | Apparent Density (kg/m³) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 85 | 22–24 | Risk of collapse, coarse cells |
| 95 | 26–27 | Slight softness, good rise |
| 100 | 28 | Sweet spot, balanced |
| 105 | 28.5 | Slightly firmer |
| 110 | 29–30 | Denser, more crosslinked |
Based on lab trials and data from Lee, H. and Neville, K. (1991). Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology.
2. Hardness & Load Bearing – “Will It Bounce Back?”
Hardness (measured as IFD – Indentation Force Deflection) loves a higher index. More NCO means more urea and biuret crosslinks, which stiffen the foam.
- Low index: Softer foam, feels “mushy.” Good for baby mattresses? Bad for your back after 8 hours.
- High index: Firmer, better support. Think “hotel mattress” vs. “couch you sink into forever.”
| Index | IFD @ 25% (N) | Resilience (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | 90 | 48 |
| 100 | 130 | 52 |
| 110 | 165 | 55 |
Resilience here is ball rebound—how much energy the foam gives back. Higher = bouncier.
💡 Fun fact: Resilience peaks around index 110–115, then drops. Too much crosslinking makes foam brittle—like a cracker instead of a marshmallow.
3. Tear Strength & Elongation – “Can It Survive My Dog?”
Tear strength usually improves with index—up to a point. More crosslinks = tougher network. But go too high, and the foam becomes brittle.
| Index | Tear Strength (N/m) | Elongation at Break (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 90 | 140 | 110 |
| 100 | 180 | 130 |
| 110 | 210 | 120 |
| 115 | 190 | 95 |
Notice the drop at 115? That’s over-crosslinking kicking in. The foam’s like a bodybuilder with no flexibility—strong, but one wrong move and snap.
Source: Saunders, J.H. and Frisch, K.C. (1962). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. Wiley Interscience.
4. Compression Set – “Will It Stay Squished?”
This is critical for long-life foams. Compression set measures how well the foam recovers after being squashed for hours. You don’t want your office chair turning into a pancake by Friday.
Higher index = better compression set… to a point.
| Index | Compression Set (%) – 50%, 22h, 70°C |
|---|---|
| 90 | 8.5 |
| 100 | 6.2 |
| 110 | 4.8 |
| 115 | 5.1 |
Ah, the classic “U-curve.” Index 110 wins. At 115, the foam is so rigid it can’t fully recover—like a grumpy old man refusing to get off the couch.
5. Cell Structure & Openness – “Breathing Room”
Foam cells need to be open, not sealed like tiny pressure cookers. Water-blown foams rely on CO₂ to open cells during rise.
- Low index: Slower gelation, longer window for cell opening. But risk of collapse.
- High index: Faster gelation may close cells too early → closed-cell foam → poor breathability, squeaky when you sit.
Microscopy studies show optimal openness at index 100–105. Beyond that, you start seeing more closed cells.
🔍 One Japanese study (Suzuki et al., 1998, Polymer Journal) used SEM to show that at index 110, cell windows shrink by ~30% compared to index 100. Your foam starts holding its breath.
The Role of Catalysts – The Puppeteers
You can’t talk index without mentioning catalysts. Amines (like DABCO) speed up the gelling reaction (NCO + OH), while tin catalysts (like DBTDL) favor blowing (NCO + H₂O).
If you crank up the index but don’t adjust catalysts, you might get a rise-gelation mismatch—foam rises like a soufflé but gels too late → collapse city.
Smart formulators tweak catalyst ratios when changing index:
| Index | Gel Catalyst (pphp*) | Blow Catalyst (pphp) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 0.2 | 0.3 | Need faster gel to catch rising foam |
| 100 | 0.25 | 0.25 | Balanced |
| 110 | 0.35 | 0.15 | Speed up gel, slow down blow |
pphp = parts per hundred parts polyol
Source: Ulrich, H. (1996). Chemistry and Technology of Isocyanates. Wiley.
Real-World Trade-Offs – The “Yes, But…” Zone
Let’s say you want a firmer foam for a sofa base. You bump the index to 110. Great! Hardness up, compression set down. But…
- Cost: TDI isn’t cheap. Extra 10% isocyanate = higher material cost.
- Toxicity: Unreacted NCO can linger. Higher index means more residual monomer unless you cure properly.
- Processing: Faster reaction = shorter cream time. Your mixer better be fast, or you’ll have foam in the wrong place. 🚨
One European manufacturer (BASF, Polyurethanes Expertise, 2003) reported that increasing index from 100 to 110 reduced pot life by 15 seconds—enough to clog a metering head if you’re not careful.
So, What’s the Sweet Spot?
For standard flexible slabstock foam using TDI-80, the consensus across literature and industry practice is:
✅ Index 100–105 delivers the best balance:
- Good density control
- Optimal hardness and support
- Excellent resilience and tear strength
- Low compression set
- Open cell structure
Go below 95 or above 110, and you’re in “specialty territory”—either ultra-soft convoluted foam for packaging or high-resilience automotive foam with trade-offs.
Final Thoughts – A Foam Philosopher’s Corner
Foam making is part science, part art, and part stubbornness. The isocyanate index isn’t a magic dial, but it’s one of the most powerful knobs on the control panel.
It’s like seasoning a steak: you can’t fix a bad cut with salt, but the right amount makes it sing. Similarly, you can’t fix a poor polyol blend with index tweaks—but get it right, and you’ve got a foam that supports, bounces, breathes, and lasts.
So next time you sink into your couch, give a silent nod to the chemists who balanced that NCO index just right. They didn’t just make foam—they made comfort. And maybe saved your back. 🙌
References
- Oertel, G. (1985). Polyurethane Handbook. Munich: Hanser Publishers.
- Lee, H. and Neville, K. (1991). Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology. Hanser.
- Saunders, J.H. and Frisch, K.C. (1962). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. New York: Wiley Interscience.
- Ulrich, H. (1996). Chemistry and Technology of Isocyanates. Chichester: Wiley.
- Suzuki, T., et al. (1998). "Cell Structure Development in Flexible Polyurethane Foams." Polymer Journal, 30(7), 543–549.
- BASF. (2003). Polyurethanes Expertise: Flexible Slabstock Foaming. Ludwigshafen: BASF SE.
- Floyd, R.L. (2005). "The Role of Isocyanate Index in Flexible Foam Performance." Journal of Cellular Plastics, 41(3), 211–225.
No foam was harmed in the making of this article. But several coffee cups were. ☕
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
