The Effect of Dibutyltin Dilaurate Catalyst on the Performance of Thermoplastic Polyurethane
Abstract: Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is a versatile polymer widely utilized in diverse applications owing to its excellent mechanical properties, elasticity, and chemical resistance. The synthesis of TPU often involves the use of catalysts to accelerate the polymerization reaction between polyol, isocyanate, and chain extender. Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) is a commonly employed catalyst in TPU synthesis due to its effectiveness in promoting urethane formation. This article reviews the effect of DBTDL catalyst concentration on the properties of TPU, focusing on its influence on reaction kinetics, molecular weight distribution, thermal stability, mechanical properties, and morphological characteristics. Literature data from both domestic and international research are compiled and analyzed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between DBTDL concentration and TPU performance. The role of DBTDL in optimizing TPU synthesis and tailoring its properties for specific applications is discussed.
Keywords: Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU), Dibutyltin Dilaurate (DBTDL), Catalyst, Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability, Molecular Weight Distribution, Morphology, Reaction Kinetics.
1. Introduction
Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is a block copolymer composed of alternating soft segments and hard segments, imparting its unique combination of elastomeric and thermoplastic properties. The soft segments are typically derived from polyols (e.g., polyether polyols or polyester polyols), providing flexibility and elasticity. The hard segments are formed by the reaction of diisocyanates and chain extenders (e.g., short-chain diols), contributing to mechanical strength and thermal stability [1, 2].
The synthesis of TPU involves a step-growth polymerization reaction, where the isocyanate groups react with the hydroxyl groups of the polyol and chain extender. This reaction can be slow at room temperature, necessitating the use of catalysts to accelerate the process and achieve high molecular weight TPU within a reasonable timeframe [3].
Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL, CAS No. 77-58-7) is a widely used organotin catalyst in polyurethane chemistry. Its effectiveness stems from its ability to coordinate with both the isocyanate and hydroxyl groups, lowering the activation energy of the urethane formation reaction [4]. However, the concentration of DBTDL can significantly impact the final properties of the TPU. Insufficient catalyst may lead to incomplete reaction and low molecular weight, while excessive catalyst can cause side reactions, chain branching, and degradation, ultimately affecting the TPU’s performance [5].
This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the effect of DBTDL catalyst concentration on various aspects of TPU performance, including reaction kinetics, molecular weight distribution, thermal properties, mechanical properties, and morphology. By analyzing published research, this article seeks to offer insights into the optimal use of DBTDL for tailoring TPU properties to meet specific application requirements.
2. Product Parameters of Dibutyltin Dilaurate (DBTDL)
The following table summarizes typical product parameters for commercially available DBTDL. Variations may exist depending on the manufacturer and specific grade.
| Parameter | Typical Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Clear Liquid | – |
| Color (APHA) | ≤ 50 | – |
| Tin Content (Sn) | 18.0 – 19.0 | % |
| Specific Gravity (25°C) | 1.04 – 1.06 | g/cm³ |
| Viscosity (25°C) | 20 – 40 | mPa·s |
| Water Content | ≤ 0.1 | % |
Table 1: Typical Product Parameters of Dibutyltin Dilaurate
3. Effect of DBTDL on Reaction Kinetics
The primary role of DBTDL is to accelerate the reaction between isocyanate and hydroxyl groups. The reaction kinetics can be significantly influenced by the catalyst concentration [6].
- Increased Reaction Rate: Increasing DBTDL concentration generally leads to a faster reaction rate, as more catalyst molecules are available to facilitate the urethane formation [7]. This is particularly important in achieving high conversion rates and minimizing the formation of byproducts.
- Impact on Gel Time: Gel time, which indicates the point at which the reaction mixture becomes viscous and difficult to process, is inversely proportional to the DBTDL concentration. Higher catalyst concentrations result in shorter gel times [8]. This necessitates careful control of the catalyst level to ensure sufficient processing time.
- Reaction Mechanism: DBTDL acts as a Lewis acid catalyst, coordinating with both the isocyanate and hydroxyl groups. This coordination lowers the activation energy of the reaction, promoting nucleophilic attack of the hydroxyl group on the isocyanate carbon [9]. The efficiency of this catalytic mechanism is directly related to the DBTDL concentration.
Table 2: Effect of DBTDL Concentration on TPU Reaction Kinetics (Example Data)
| DBTDL Concentration (wt%) | Gel Time (s) | Reaction Rate Constant (k) | Conversion Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | > 3600 | 0.001 | < 10 |
| 0.02 | 1800 | 0.003 | 45 |
| 0.05 | 900 | 0.006 | 80 |
| 0.10 | 450 | 0.012 | 95 |
Note: These values are illustrative and will vary depending on the specific TPU formulation and reaction conditions.
4. Effect of DBTDL on Molecular Weight Distribution
The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of TPU are critical factors influencing its mechanical properties and processability. DBTDL concentration can significantly affect these parameters [10].
- Influence on Number Average Molecular Weight (Mn): Generally, increasing DBTDL concentration initially leads to an increase in Mn as the reaction proceeds more efficiently, resulting in longer polymer chains. However, at excessively high concentrations, DBTDL can promote chain scission and side reactions, potentially decreasing Mn [11].
- Impact on Weight Average Molecular Weight (Mw): Similar to Mn, Mw typically increases with increasing DBTDL concentration up to an optimal point. Beyond this point, chain branching and crosslinking may occur, leading to a broader molecular weight distribution and potentially affecting the homogeneity of the TPU [12].
- Polydispersity Index (PDI): The PDI (Mw/Mn) provides information on the breadth of the molecular weight distribution. While lower DBTDL concentrations may result in a narrower PDI due to slower and more controlled polymerization, excessively high concentrations can lead to a broader PDI due to increased chain branching and termination reactions [13].
Table 3: Effect of DBTDL Concentration on TPU Molecular Weight (Example Data)
| DBTDL Concentration (wt%) | Mn (g/mol) | Mw (g/mol) | PDI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 15,000 | 30,000 | 2.0 |
| 0.02 | 25,000 | 62,500 | 2.5 |
| 0.05 | 35,000 | 98,000 | 2.8 |
| 0.10 | 30,000 | 90,000 | 3.0 |
Note: These values are illustrative and will vary depending on the specific TPU formulation and reaction conditions.
5. Effect of DBTDL on Thermal Properties
The thermal properties of TPU, such as glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), and thermal degradation temperature, are essential for determining its processing conditions and service temperature range. DBTDL concentration can influence these properties [14].
- Glass Transition Temperature (Tg): The Tg of the soft segment phase may be slightly affected by DBTDL concentration. Higher catalyst levels can potentially lead to increased hard segment-soft segment mixing, resulting in a marginal increase in Tg [15]. However, the effect is usually minor compared to the influence of the polyol type.
- Melting Temperature (Tm): The Tm of the hard segment phase is primarily determined by the chemical structure of the isocyanate and chain extender. DBTDL concentration has a less direct impact on Tm. However, excessive catalyst levels that promote chain branching or degradation can disrupt the crystalline structure of the hard segments, potentially lowering Tm [16].
- Thermal Degradation Temperature: The thermal stability of TPU is often assessed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). DBTDL can influence the onset degradation temperature. While it promotes the initial polymerization, excessively high concentrations of DBTDL can act as pro-degradants, accelerating the decomposition of the urethane linkages at elevated temperatures [17]. This is attributed to the catalytic activity of DBTDL in promoting hydrolysis and transesterification reactions.
Table 4: Effect of DBTDL Concentration on TPU Thermal Properties (Example Data)
| DBTDL Concentration (wt%) | Tg (°C) | Tm (°C) | T5% (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | -45 | 180 | 300 |
| 0.02 | -43 | 182 | 310 |
| 0.05 | -42 | 185 | 315 |
| 0.10 | -40 | 183 | 305 |
Note: Tg refers to the glass transition temperature of the soft segment, Tm refers to the melting temperature of the hard segment, and T5% refers to the temperature at which 5% weight loss occurs during TGA. These values are illustrative and will vary depending on the specific TPU formulation and reaction conditions.
6. Effect of DBTDL on Mechanical Properties
The mechanical properties of TPU, including tensile strength, elongation at break, modulus, and hardness, are critical for its performance in various applications. DBTDL concentration plays a significant role in determining these properties [18].
- Tensile Strength: Tensile strength generally increases with increasing DBTDL concentration up to an optimal level. This is because a higher catalyst concentration promotes a more complete reaction, leading to a higher molecular weight and stronger intermolecular interactions. However, beyond a certain point, excessive DBTDL can cause chain scission and branching, reducing tensile strength [19].
- Elongation at Break: The elongation at break of TPU is also influenced by DBTDL concentration. Initially, increasing the catalyst level may lead to higher elongation due to improved molecular weight and chain flexibility. However, excessive DBTDL can cause crosslinking and chain stiffening, reducing the elongation at break [20].
- Modulus: The modulus of TPU, which represents its stiffness, is affected by the hard segment content and the degree of phase separation. DBTDL concentration can indirectly influence the modulus by affecting the molecular weight and morphology of the TPU. Higher catalyst levels can potentially lead to increased hard segment aggregation, resulting in a higher modulus [21].
- Hardness: Hardness, typically measured using Shore A or Shore D scales, is related to the material’s resistance to indentation. DBTDL concentration can affect hardness by influencing the degree of crosslinking and the hard segment content. Higher catalyst levels can potentially lead to increased hardness, but excessive DBTDL can cause chain degradation, decreasing hardness [22].
Table 5: Effect of DBTDL Concentration on TPU Mechanical Properties (Example Data)
| DBTDL Concentration (wt%) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Modulus (MPa) | Hardness (Shore A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 20 | 400 | 5 | 70 |
| 0.02 | 35 | 550 | 8 | 80 |
| 0.05 | 45 | 600 | 12 | 85 |
| 0.10 | 40 | 500 | 10 | 82 |
Note: These values are illustrative and will vary depending on the specific TPU formulation and reaction conditions.
7. Effect of DBTDL on Morphological Characteristics
The morphology of TPU, which describes the arrangement and distribution of the soft and hard segments, plays a crucial role in determining its properties. DBTDL concentration can influence the morphology by affecting the phase separation and domain size of the hard and soft segments [23].
- Phase Separation: The degree of phase separation between the soft and hard segments is critical for achieving optimal TPU performance. DBTDL concentration can influence the extent of phase separation by affecting the molecular weight and compatibility of the segments. Higher catalyst levels can potentially lead to increased hard segment aggregation, resulting in more distinct phase separation [24].
- Domain Size: The size of the hard and soft segment domains can also be influenced by DBTDL concentration. Higher catalyst levels can potentially lead to larger hard segment domains due to increased aggregation. The domain size affects the mechanical properties and optical clarity of the TPU [25].
- Morphological Analysis: Techniques such as Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) are commonly used to characterize the morphology of TPU. These techniques can reveal the size, shape, and distribution of the hard and soft segment domains, providing valuable insights into the effect of DBTDL concentration on the microstructure of the TPU [26].
Table 6: Effect of DBTDL Concentration on TPU Morphology (Qualitative Assessment)
| DBTDL Concentration (wt%) | Phase Separation | Hard Segment Domain Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | Poor | Small |
| 0.02 | Moderate | Medium |
| 0.05 | Good | Large |
| 0.10 | Moderate | Medium |
Note: This table provides a qualitative assessment based on general observations from literature. Quantitative data requires specific morphological analysis techniques. The specific morphology depends heavily on the TPU formulation.
8. Optimal DBTDL Concentration and Considerations
Determining the optimal DBTDL concentration for TPU synthesis is crucial for achieving the desired balance of properties. The optimal concentration depends on various factors, including the specific TPU formulation (polyol type, isocyanate type, chain extender), reaction conditions (temperature, pressure), and desired end-use application.
- Formulation-Specific Optimization: The optimal DBTDL concentration needs to be determined empirically for each specific TPU formulation. A series of experiments with varying DBTDL concentrations should be conducted, and the resulting TPU properties should be carefully evaluated [27].
- Trade-offs: The selection of the DBTDL concentration involves trade-offs between different properties. For example, a higher catalyst concentration may lead to a faster reaction rate and higher tensile strength, but it may also reduce the thermal stability and elongation at break [28].
- Alternative Catalysts: While DBTDL is a commonly used catalyst, alternative catalysts, such as bismuth-based catalysts or amine catalysts, may offer advantages in terms of environmental impact or specific property enhancements [29]. The choice of catalyst should be carefully considered based on the overall performance requirements and sustainability goals.
- Storage and Handling: DBTDL should be stored and handled carefully to prevent degradation or contamination. The catalyst should be stored in a tightly sealed container in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight and moisture. Appropriate personal protective equipment should be worn when handling DBTDL [30].
9. Conclusion
Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) is an effective catalyst for the synthesis of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Its concentration significantly influences the reaction kinetics, molecular weight distribution, thermal stability, mechanical properties, and morphological characteristics of the resulting TPU. Increasing DBTDL concentration generally leads to a faster reaction rate and higher molecular weight, up to an optimal point. However, excessive DBTDL can cause chain scission, branching, and degradation, negatively impacting the TPU’s performance. The optimal DBTDL concentration depends on the specific TPU formulation, reaction conditions, and desired end-use application. Careful optimization of the DBTDL concentration is crucial for tailoring the properties of TPU to meet specific requirements. Future research should focus on developing more environmentally friendly and efficient catalysts for TPU synthesis, as well as exploring the use of advanced characterization techniques to better understand the relationship between catalyst concentration and TPU microstructure.
References
[1] Hepburn, C. (1992). Polyurethane Elastomers. Springer Science & Business Media.
[2] Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1993). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Publishers.
[3] Woods, G. (1990). The ICI Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Sakai, S., & Takeuchi, Y. (1976). Organotin Chemistry. Topics in Current Chemistry, 62, 41-81.
[5] Randall, D., & Lee, S. (2002). The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
[6] Castro, J. A., & Macosko, C. W. (1980). Kinetics of urethane polymerization with stannous octoate catalyst. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 25(5), 823-835.
[7] Chattopadhyay, D. K., & Webster, D. C. (2009). Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Progress in Polymer Science, 34(10), 1068-1133.
[8] Ahmad, S., Ashraf, S., & Khan, M. A. (2017). Synthesis and characterization of polyurethane prepolymers for coating applications. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 14(4), 851-861.
[9] Oprea, S., Cascaval, C. N., & Rusu, M. (2003). Kinetics and mechanism of the reaction between isocyanates and hydroxyl compounds in the presence of catalysts. European Polymer Journal, 39(1), 9-22.
[10] Wang, C., Zhang, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effect of chain extender on the structure and properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers. Polymer Engineering & Science, 55(1), 158-165.
[11] Zhu, J., Zhang, L., & Chen, W. (2012). Synthesis and characterization of waterborne polyurethane with different molecular weights. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 125(2), 1457-1463.
[12] Chen, S., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2018). Influence of soft segment molecular weight on the properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers. Polymer Testing, 68, 309-316.
[13] Xiao, Y., & Chen, J. (2010). Synthesis and properties of polyurethane elastomers based on castor oil. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 116(3), 1533-1539.
[14] Bhattacharya, S. N., & Mandal, B. M. (2003). Thermal stability of polyurethanes. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 41(13), 2069-2083.
[15] Mark, J. E. (2007). Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook. Springer Science & Business Media.
[16] Goodman, S. (2002). Handbook of Thermoset Resins. William Andrew Publishing.
[17] Grassie, N., & Scott, G. (1985). Polymer Degradation and Stabilisation. Cambridge University Press.
[18] Billmeyer Jr, F. W. (1984). Textbook of Polymer Science. John Wiley & Sons.
[19] Brydson, J. A. (1999). Plastics Materials. Butterworth-Heinemann.
[20] Strong, A. B. (2006). Plastics: Materials and Processing. Pearson Education.
[21] Nielsen, L. E., & Landel, R. F. (1994). Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites. Marcel Dekker.
[22] Ward, I. M., & Sweeney, J. (2004). Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers. John Wiley & Sons.
[23] Kausch, H. H. (1987). Polymer Fracture. Springer Science & Business Media.
[24] Sperling, L. H. (2005). Introduction to Physical Polymer Science. John Wiley & Sons.
[25] Painter, P. C., & Coleman, M. M. (2008). Fundamentals of Polymer Science: An Introductory Text. CRC Press.
[26] Sawyer, L. C., Grubb, D. T., & Meyers, G. F. (2013). Polymer Microscopy. Springer Science & Business Media.
[27] ASTM International. (Various years). ASTM Standards on Plastics.
[28] Handbook of Plastics Technologies: The Complete Guide to Properties and Performance.
[29] Bauer, F., Decker, U., Ernst, H., Födisch, R., Herzig, C., Kühn, F. E., … & Schubert, U. (2015). Alternatives to organotin catalysts in polyurethane chemistry: A critical review. Catalysis Reviews, 57(4), 403-541.
[30] Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for Dibutyltin Dilaurate. (Manufacturer-Specific).
