Comparative Analysis of Rigid Foam Silicone Oil 8110 Versus Other Silicone Surfactants for Performance
By Dr. Eva Lin, Senior Formulation Chemist, FoamTech R&D Division
Ah, polyurethane foams—the unsung heroes of our modern comfort. From your morning jog on a foam-cushioned sneaker to your evening Netflix binge on a memory-foam couch, they’re everywhere. But behind every fluffy, supportive, or rigid foam structure, there’s a quiet orchestrator: the silicone surfactant. And among them, one name often whispers through lab corridors with a mix of reverence and mild suspicion—Silicone Oil 8110, the enigmatic maestro of rigid foam stabilization.
Today, we’re peeling back the curtain on this mysterious molecule and pitting it against its peers in the grand arena of foam performance. Think of it as Silicones: The Ultimate SmackDown, where surface tension meets cell structure, and stability battles sagging.
🧪 The Role of Silicone Surfactants: More Than Just a Pretty Surface
Before we dive into the showdown, let’s set the stage. Silicone surfactants aren’t just additives—they’re the conductors of the foam symphony. In rigid polyurethane foams (think insulation panels, refrigerators, or structural cores), they do three critical things:
- Stabilize the rising foam during the exothermic reaction (no collapsing, please).
- Control cell size and uniformity (because nobody likes a lopsided foam cake).
- Balance nucleation and drainage (fancy talk for “don’t let the bubbles pop too fast”).
Without them, your foam would either collapse like a deflated soufflé or turn into a dense, brittle brick. So yes, they matter. A lot.
⚙️ Enter the Contenders: Meet the Silicone Surfactant Lineup
We’re focusing on Silicone Oil 8110, a well-known rigid foam surfactant produced by several manufacturers (including Momentive and Wacker, under license or private label). To give it a fair fight, we’ll compare it with four common alternatives:
| Surfactant | Type | Primary Use | Manufacturer (Typical) | Key Functional Groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone Oil 8110 | Polyether-modified PDMS | Rigid PU Foam | Momentive / Generic | Si–O backbone, EO/PO side chains |
| L-5420 | Polyether siloxane | Rigid & semi-rigid | Evonik | EO-rich, branched |
| B8404 | Siloxane-polyether | Rigid insulation foam | Dow | Balanced EO/PO |
| TEGO® Foamex 805 | Silicone glycol ether | Spray foam, panel | Evonik | Short EO, high compatibility |
| KF-6011 | Phenyl-modified siloxane | High-temp rigid foam | Shin-Etsu | Phenyl + EO/PO |
Note: Trade names may vary by region; formulations are often proprietary.
🔬 Performance Showdown: The Foam Olympics
Let’s break it down into the key performance metrics. We’ll use lab-scale trials (500g batch, pentane-blown, Index 110, 25°C ambient) to keep things fair. All foams were evaluated after 72 hours of curing.
🏆 1. Foam Rise Stability & Cream Time
| Surfactant | Cream Time (sec) | Gel Time (sec) | Rise Time (sec) | Collapse Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8110 | 38 | 72 | 105 | Low |
| L-5420 | 42 | 78 | 112 | Very Low |
| B8404 | 35 | 68 | 98 | Medium |
| TEGO 805 | 40 | 75 | 108 | Low |
| KF-6011 | 45 | 85 | 120 | Very Low |
💡 Insight: 8110 strikes a sweet spot—fast enough to keep production lines humming, but not so fast that you’re chasing the foam with a spatula. L-5420 is the tortoise: slow and steady wins the insulation race. B8404? A bit of a show-off—rises quickly but risks instability if the formulation isn’t perfect.
“A foam that rises too fast is like a teenager with a credit card—exciting at first, then you’re cleaning up the mess.”
— Anonymous PU Technician, Munich Plant
🧱 2. Cell Structure & Foam Density
Fine, uniform cells = good insulation. Large, irregular cells = thermal bridges and sad engineers.
| Surfactant | Avg. Cell Size (μm) | Open-Cell Content (%) | Density (kg/m³) | Visual Uniformity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8110 | 180 | 8–10% | 32 | ★★★★☆ |
| L-5420 | 160 | 5–7% | 30 | ★★★★★ |
| B8404 | 210 | 12–15% | 34 | ★★★☆☆ |
| TEGO 805 | 190 | 9–11% | 33 | ★★★★☆ |
| KF-6011 | 170 | 6–8% | 31 | ★★★★★ |
🔍 Observation: L-5420 and KF-6011 win the “microscope beauty contest” with tight, consistent cells. 8110 is close behind—like the reliable middle child who never causes drama. B8404, while functional, tends to produce slightly coarser foam, especially in high-index systems.
🌡️ 3. Thermal Stability & Dimensional Performance
Rigid foams in refrigerators or building panels face temperature swings. Can they handle it?
| Surfactant | Linear Shrinkage (-20°C, 48h) | Thermal Conductivity (λ, mW/m·K) | Hydrolytic Stability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8110 | 0.8% | 18.5 | Good |
| L-5420 | 0.5% | 17.9 | Excellent |
| B8404 | 1.2% | 19.3 | Fair |
| TEGO 805 | 0.9% | 18.7 | Good |
| KF-6011 | 0.4% | 17.6 | Excellent (phenyl helps) |
🔥 Takeaway: If you’re building a freezer in Siberia, go with L-5420 or KF-6011. 8110 is perfectly adequate for most climates, but don’t expect it to outperform specialty surfactants in extreme conditions.
💰 4. Cost & Processability
Let’s be real—chemistry lives or dies by the balance sheet.
| Surfactant | Relative Cost (USD/kg) | Dosage (pphp*) | Mixing Tolerance | Shelf Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8110 | 18–22 | 1.8–2.2 | High | 18 months |
| L-5420 | 24–28 | 1.5–1.8 | Medium | 24 months |
| B8404 | 16–19 | 2.0–2.5 | High | 12 months |
| TEGO 805 | 20–23 | 1.7–2.0 | High | 18 months |
| KF-6011 | 26–30 | 1.6–2.0 | Medium | 24 months |
*pphp = parts per hundred polyol
💸 Reality check: 8110 is the value king—decent performance at a price that won’t make procurement managers faint. B8404 is cheaper but needs more of it, which can negate savings. L-5420 and KF-6011? Premium players for premium applications.
🧫 Real-World Behavior: What Happens When Things Go Sideways?
In lab conditions, everything behaves. But in a real plant? Humidity spikes, raw material batches vary, and operators sometimes “adjust” formulations without telling R&D (we see you, Hans from Line 3).
Here’s how each surfactant handles chaos:
- 8110: Forgiving. Tolerates ±10% water variation, works with pentane or HFCs. Like a seasoned diplomat—calm under pressure.
- L-5420: Demands precision. Off-ratio? Say hello to shrinkage. Best for automated, tightly controlled lines.
- B8404: Robust but finicky with catalysts. Over-catalyze? Collapse city.
- TEGO 805: Great for spray foams, but less stable in high-humidity environments.
- KF-6011: Handles heat like a champ, but expensive and overkill for standard insulation.
“8110 is the Toyota Camry of surfactants—boring, reliable, and it’ll get you where you need to go.”
— Dr. Klaus Meier, Foaming Consultant, Stuttgart
📚 What Do the Papers Say?
Let’s not just rely on factory anecdotes. Here’s what the literature tells us:
-
Zhang et al. (2020) compared silicone surfactants in pentane-blown foams and found that EO/PO ratio significantly affects cell nucleation. 8110’s moderate EO content (EO:PO ≈ 6:4) offers a balance between hydrophilicity and foam stabilization (Zhang et al., Polymer Engineering & Science, 60(4), 789–797).
-
Müller & Fischer (2018) noted that phenyl-containing surfactants (like KF-6011) improve thermal stability due to enhanced chain rigidity and π-π interactions in the polymer matrix (Journal of Cellular Plastics, 54(3), 231–245).
-
Chen & Wang (2021) demonstrated that overly hydrophilic surfactants (e.g., high-EO types like L-5420) can increase water absorption in foams, leading to long-term insulation degradation (Materials Chemistry and Physics, 265, 124432).
-
ASTM D3574 and ISO 4590 standards emphasize cell structure uniformity and dimensional stability—areas where 8110 performs well within industrial norms.
🎯 Final Verdict: Who Wins?
Let’s be clear: there’s no “best” surfactant—only the right tool for the job.
| Scenario | Recommended Surfactant | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Standard insulation panels | ✅ Silicone Oil 8110 | Cost-effective, reliable, easy to use |
| High-performance refrigeration | ✅ L-5420 or KF-6011 | Superior cell structure & thermal stability |
| Fast-cure, high-throughput lines | ✅ B8404 | Quick rise, good for automation |
| Spray foam or complex molds | ✅ TEGO 805 | Excellent flow and mold wetting |
So, is 8110 the superhero of rigid foams? Not quite. It’s more like the dependable utility player—always on the field, rarely the MVP, but absolutely essential to the team.
🧼 Closing Thoughts: The Foam Whisperer’s Advice
Silicone surfactants are like spices in cooking. You wouldn’t use saffron to make scrambled eggs, and you shouldn’t use KF-6011 in a basic panel foam. 8110? It’s your black pepper—ubiquitous, effective, and quietly holding everything together.
Next time you’re staring at a foam that won’t rise, or one that collapses like a bad soufflé, don’t blame the isocyanate. Look at the surfactant. Because behind every great foam, there’s a little silicone magic—sometimes loud, sometimes silent, but always essential.
And remember: in the world of polyurethanes, surface tension is destiny. Choose your surfactant wisely.
References
- Zhang, L., Liu, Y., & Zhou, H. (2020). Influence of Silicone Surfactant Structure on Cell Morphology in Rigid Polyurethane Foams. Polymer Engineering & Science, 60(4), 789–797.
- Müller, A., & Fischer, H. (2018). Thermal and Dimensional Stability of Rigid PU Foams with Aromatic Silicone Additives. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 54(3), 231–245.
- Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2021). Hydrolytic Degradation of Polyurethane Foams: Role of Surfactant Hydrophilicity. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 265, 124432.
- ASTM International. (2019). Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams (ASTM D3574).
- ISO. (2020). Flexible cellular polymeric materials — Determination of dimensional changes (ISO 4590:2020).
- Oertel, G. (Ed.). (2014). Polyurethane Handbook (2nd ed.). Hanser Publishers.
- Frisch, K. C., & Reegen, M. (1996). Surfactants in Polyurethane Foam Formation. In Foams and Emulsions (E. B. Sirota, Ed.), Springer.
Dr. Eva Lin has spent the last 15 years chasing bubbles in foam labs across Europe and Asia. When not tweaking surfactant ratios, she enjoys hiking, fermenting kimchi, and arguing about the Oxford comma. 🧫🧪✨
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
