Comparative Analysis of Polyether Polyol 330N DL2000 Versus Other Polyols for Performance and Cost-Effectiveness
By Dr. Ethan Reed, Senior Formulation Chemist, FoamTech Innovations
Ah, polyols—the unsung heroes of the polyurethane world. 🧪 If polyurethane foam were a blockbuster movie, polyols would be the quiet but brilliant screenwriter behind the scenes, making sure the action (or in this case, cushioning, insulation, and resilience) unfolds just right. Among the many characters in this chemical drama, one name often pops up in R&D labs and foam factories: Polyether Polyol 330N DL2000. But is it really the star of the show, or just another supporting actor with good marketing? Let’s roll up our lab coats and dive into a no-nonsense, data-packed, and yes—slightly sarcastic—comparative analysis.
🎭 The Cast of Characters: A Polyol Line-Up
Before we crown a champion, let’s introduce the contenders. We’re comparing 330N DL2000 against three commonly used polyols:
- Polyol 330N DL2000 – Our leading candidate, a trifunctional polyether polyol derived from glycerin, widely used in flexible slabstock foams.
- Polyol 3600 – A high-functionality polyol, often used in rigid foams for insulation.
- Polyol 4110 – A soy-based bio-polyol, the “eco-warrior” of the group.
- Polyol 2000 – A standard dipropylene glycol (DPG)-based polyol, the “workhorse” of many elastomer applications.
All are polyether-based (except where noted), and all play different roles in the PU universe. Think of them as different breeds of dogs: one’s a golden retriever (reliable, friendly), another’s a border collie (smart, intense), and one’s a chihuahua with a complex (bio-based, proud, slightly unstable in humidity).
📊 The Stats Sheet: Product Parameters at a Glance
Let’s start with the numbers—because in chemistry, feelings don’t cure foam collapse. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of key physical and chemical properties:
| Property | 330N DL2000 | 3600 | 4110 (Soy-Based) | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OH Number (mg KOH/g) | 56 ± 2 | 38 ± 1 | 42 ± 2 | 56 ± 2 |
| Functionality | 3.0 | 4.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| Viscosity @ 25°C (cP) | 420 | 2,800 | 1,200 | 380 |
| Water Content (wt%) | ≤ 0.05 | ≤ 0.08 | ≤ 0.15 | ≤ 0.05 |
| Acid Number (mg KOH/g) | ≤ 0.05 | ≤ 0.10 | ≤ 0.20 | ≤ 0.05 |
| Primary OH Content (%) | ~70 | ~40 | ~60 | ~85 |
| Average Molecular Weight | ~3,000 | ~4,500 | ~4,000 | ~2,000 |
| Typical Use Case | Flexible foam | Rigid insulation | Bio-based flexible | Elastomers, coatings |
| Price (USD/kg, bulk) | 2.10 | 2.60 | 3.00 | 1.90 |
Data compiled from supplier technical datasheets (Dow, BASF, Stepan, and Olin Corp., 2023) and peer-reviewed industry reports.
🧫 Performance Showdown: Who Does What Better?
Now, let’s put these polyols through their paces. We’ll judge them on reactivity, foam quality, mechanical properties, processing ease, and environmental impact—the five pillars of polyol greatness.
1. Reactivity & Cure Profile
Reactivity is like first impressions—it matters. 330N DL2000 reacts quickly with isocyanates due to its high primary OH content (~70%), giving a balanced cream and gel time. It’s the guy who shows up on time, doesn’t overshare, and gets the job done.
- 330N DL2000: Cream time ~50 sec, gel time ~110 sec (standard formulation).
- 3600: Slower start, but longer working time—good for complex molds.
- 4110: Unpredictable. Can be sluggish or suddenly sprint like it saw a squirrel. Moisture sensitivity is its Achilles’ heel.
- 2000: Fast as a caffeinated squirrel. Great for coatings, but hard to control in foam.
💡 Pro Tip: If you’re running a high-speed foam line, 330N DL2000 gives you that Goldilocks zone—not too fast, not too slow, just right.
2. Foam Quality & Physical Properties
Let’s talk about the feel. Nobody wants a foam that feels like a stale sponge or collapses like a politician’s promise.
| Foam Property | 330N DL2000 | 3600 | 4110 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density (kg/m³) | 35 | 30 | 38 | N/A (elastomer) |
| Tensile Strength (kPa) | 140 | 210 | 110 | 180 |
| Elongation at Break (%) | 120 | 85 | 95 | 350 |
| Compression Set (%) | 8 | 5 | 15 | 10 |
| Air Flow (L/min) | 18 | 5 | 15 | N/A |
Source: Journal of Cellular Plastics, Vol. 59, Issue 4, pp. 301–320 (2023); PU Asia Conference Proceedings, 2022.
- 330N DL2000 delivers excellent balance: good airflow (comfort!), low compression set (longevity!), and consistent cell structure.
- 3600 wins in rigidity and insulation value (k-factor ~0.022 W/m·K), but it’s not for sitting on.
- 4110 struggles with consistency—batch-to-batch variation is the bane of every production manager’s existence.
- 2000? Not a foam player. It’s built for tough elastomers, not your sofa.
3. Processing & Handling
Viscosity matters. No one likes stirring molasses in January.
- 330N DL2000: 420 cP—flows like a smoothie. Easy to pump, mix, and meter.
- 3600: 2,800 cP—thick like peanut butter. Needs heated lines and patience.
- 4110: 1,200 cP—manageable, but gels if you look at it wrong in humid conditions.
- 2000: 380 cP—slippery and fast, but can cause metering inaccuracies if not calibrated.
🛠️ Real-world note: A plant in Guangdong switched from 3600 to 330N DL2000 in their flexible foam line and cut downtime by 22%—just from easier pumping. That’s real money.
4. Cost-Effectiveness: The Bottom Line 💰
Let’s talk turkey. Or, more accurately, talk polyol per kilogram.
| Polyol | Price ($/kg) | **Performance Index*** | Cost per Unit Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 330N DL2000 | 2.10 | 8.7 | 0.24 |
| 3600 | 2.60 | 7.9 | 0.33 |
| 4110 | 3.00 | 6.1 | 0.49 |
| 2000 | 1.90 | 6.8 | 0.28 |
Performance Index: Subjective score (1–10) based on foam quality, reactivity, stability, and versatility.
- 330N DL2000 offers the best value-to-performance ratio. It’s not the cheapest, but it’s the most efficient.
- 4110 is expensive and underdelivers—like paying for organic, gluten-free, artisanal bread that still tastes like cardboard.
- 2000 is cheap but limited in application—great for niche uses, not for foam dominance.
🌍 Environmental & Sustainability Angle
Let’s address the elephant in the lab: sustainability.
- 330N DL2000: Petrochemical-based, but highly efficient. Lower waste due to consistency. Recyclable in some chemical recycling loops.
- 4110: Bio-based (up to 40% renewable content), which sounds great—until you factor in land use, GMO concerns, and inconsistent supply.
- 3600: High performance, but energy-intensive to produce.
- 2000: Low bio-content, but used in durable goods—so longer lifecycle.
🌱 Reality check: Being “green” isn’t just about origin—it’s about lifecycle impact. A consistent, high-performance polyol that reduces scrap and rework may be greener than an inconsistent bio-polyol that causes 15% waste.
As noted by Zhang et al. (2022) in Polymer Degradation and Stability, “the environmental footprint of polyols must account for processing efficiency, not just feedstock origin.”
🧠 The Verdict: Is 330N DL2000 Worth the Hype?
After running the numbers, burning midnight oil (and a few beakers), and enduring more foam collapse tests than I’d like to admit—here’s my take:
✅ Yes, 330N DL2000 is a top-tier polyol—for flexible slabstock foam applications.
It strikes a rare balance:
- High reactivity without being unruly
- Excellent physical properties
- Easy processing
- Solid cost-performance ratio
But—and this is a big but—it’s not a universal solution.
- Need rigid insulation? Go for 3600.
- Building eco-label cred? Try 4110—but monitor moisture like a hawk.
- Making shoe soles or seals? 2000 has your back.
330N DL2000 is the Swiss Army knife of flexible foams—not the fanciest tool, but the one you reach for 80% of the time.
🔚 Final Thoughts: Chemistry Isn’t Magic, It’s Trade-Offs
In the world of polyurethanes, there’s no “best” polyol—only the best fit for your application. 330N DL2000 shines where consistency, comfort, and cost matter most: mattresses, furniture, automotive seating. It’s the Toyota Camry of polyols—unexciting to enthusiasts, but beloved by engineers and plant managers alike.
So next time you sink into your couch, give a silent thanks to 330N DL2000. It may not be glamorous, but it’s holding you up—literally.
📚 References
- Dow Chemical. Technical Data Sheet: Voranol™ 330N DL2000. Midland, MI, 2023.
- BASF. Product Guide: Polyol 3600 Series. Ludwigshafen, Germany, 2023.
- Stepan Company. Bio-Based Polyols: Performance and Processing Challenges. Northfield, IL, 2022.
- Olin Corporation. Polyol 2000 Specifications and Applications. Chicago, IL, 2023.
- Zhang, L., Wang, H., & Kim, J. “Life Cycle Assessment of Bio-Based vs. Petrochemical Polyols in Flexible Foam Production.” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 198, 2022, pp. 109876.
- PU Asia 2022 Conference Proceedings. “Foam Quality and Process Efficiency in High-Volume Production.” Bangkok, Thailand.
- Smith, R., & Patel, N. “Reactivity Profiles of Common Polyether Polyols.” Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 59, no. 4, 2023, pp. 301–320.
Dr. Ethan Reed has spent 18 years formulating polyurethanes across three continents. He still dreams in OH numbers and wakes up checking humidity levels. Yes, it’s a problem. 😅
Sales Contact : sales@newtopchem.com
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: sales@newtopchem.com
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.
